Tell me what you think?
Does art have to be designated to a paint brush and easle?!
Or can we widen our spectrum and accept that art is also in the form of music notes and clothing. The dancers on the stage and the bass coming out of your radio.
Who was the one to designate art to a picture anyways?!
Expression of your inner emotion is another way of art, Is it not?
Or should we just rest and call that weird? You tell me?
Have we set such a trap for the definition of art that we can not accept it if it passes us in the hallway or grabs our attention on the radio? Maybe even as simple as looking at the painting.
No comments:
Post a Comment